Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > On 01/10/2018 18:20, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> On 27/09/2018 13:07, Roman Kagan wrote: >> ... >>>> >>>> I must say that now it looks even more tempting to follow the same >>>> pattern as your kvm_hv_flush_tlb: define a function that would call >>>> kvm_apic_set_irq() on all vcpus in a mask (optimizing the all-set case >>>> with a NULL mask), and make kvm_hv_send_ipi perform the same hv_vp_set >>>> -> vcpu_mask transformation followed by calling into that function. >>> >>> >>> It would perhaps be cleaner, but really kvm_apic_set_irq is as efficient >>> as it can be, since it takes the destination vcpu directly. >>> >>> The code duplication for walking the sparse set is a bit ugly, perhaps >>> that could be changed to use an iterator macro. >> >> I actually like Roman's suggestion on how to re-write kvm_hv_flush_tlb() >> and I also agree that it would be easier for future readers if we write >> kvm_hv_send_ipi() in a similar way. Actually, I already have v7 in my >> stash, will be sending it out shortly. > > Just send follow ups now, please. I already have enough long queue. :)
Oh yea, you should :-) No problem at all, I'll convert v7 into a follow-up series when kvm/queue is pushed. Thanks, -- Vitaly
