On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 08:10:31AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > There is another variant of model/stepping micro code verification code in > intel_snb_pebs_broken(). Can we please make this table based and use a > common function? That's certainly not the last quirk we're going to have. > > We already have a table based variant of ucode checking in > bad_spectre_microcode(). It's trivial enough to generalize that.
apic_check_deadline_errata() is another one. That one already uses the x86_cpu_id thing, but still plays silly games for steppings. So if we're going to build a new microcode table matcher...
