On Thursday, October 4, 2018 11:36:44 AM CEST Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:47:04AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > The comment is irrelevant as the remaining function is used for > > > statistics in addition to the perf multiplier. It does exactly what the > > > function name is. > > > > Which is my point. It shouldn't be dropped entirely, but updated IMO. > > But the function name isn't the problem.. the problem that any use of > the number is fundamentally broken. >
We're in violent agreement here. :-) I just wanted to say that the comment was still relevant at least with respect to this function, but the patch was removing the comment entirely.
