> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Andersson [mailto:bjorn.anders...@linaro.org]
> Sent: mercredi 10 octobre 2018 07:58
> To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.palla...@st.com>
> Cc: o...@wizery.com; linux-remotep...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliq...@st.com>;
> benjamin.gaign...@linaro.org; s-a...@ti.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: create vdev subdevice with
> specific dma memory pool
> 
> On Fri 27 Jul 06:14 PDT 2018, Loic Pallardy wrote:
> 
> > This patch creates a dedicated vdev subdevice for each vdev declared
> > in firmware resource table and associates carveout named "vdev%dbuffer"
> > (with %d vdev index in resource table) if any as dma coherent memory
> pool.
> >
> > Then vdev subdevice is used as parent for virtio device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.palla...@st.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 35
> +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h |  1 +
> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c   | 42
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  include/linux/remoteproc.h               |  1 +
> >  4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > index 4edc6f0..adcc66e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/idr.h>
> >  #include <linux/elf.h>
> >  #include <linux/crc32.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> >  #include <linux/virtio_ids.h>
> >  #include <linux/virtio_ring.h>
> >  #include <asm/byteorder.h>
> > @@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ static void rproc_disable_iommu(struct rproc
> *rproc)
> >     iommu_domain_free(domain);
> >  }
> >
> > -static phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr)
> > +phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr)
> >  {
> >     /*
> >      * Return physical address according to virtual address location
> > @@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ static phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void
> *cpu_addr)
> >     WARN_ON(!virt_addr_valid(cpu_addr));
> >     return virt_to_phys(cpu_addr);
> >  }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_va_to_pa);
> >
> >  /**
> >   * rproc_da_to_va() - lookup the kernel virtual address for a remoteproc
> address
> > @@ -423,6 +425,20 @@ static void rproc_vdev_do_stop(struct
> rproc_subdev *subdev, bool crashed)
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > + * rproc_rvdev_release() - release the existence of a rvdev
> > + *
> > + * @dev: the subdevice's dev
> > + */
> > +static void rproc_rvdev_release(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +   struct rproc_vdev *rvdev = container_of(dev, struct rproc_vdev,
> dev);
> > +
> > +   of_reserved_mem_device_release(dev);
> > +
> > +   kfree(rvdev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> >   * rproc_handle_vdev() - handle a vdev fw resource
> >   * @rproc: the remote processor
> >   * @rsc: the vring resource descriptor
> > @@ -455,6 +471,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc,
> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
> >     struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> >     struct rproc_vdev *rvdev;
> >     int i, ret;
> > +   char name[16];
> >
> >     /* make sure resource isn't truncated */
> >     if (sizeof(*rsc) + rsc->num_of_vrings * sizeof(struct
> fw_rsc_vdev_vring)
> > @@ -488,6 +505,18 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc,
> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
> >     rvdev->rproc = rproc;
> >     rvdev->index = rproc->nb_vdev++;
> >
> > +   /* Initialise vdev subdevice */
> > +   snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dbuffer", rvdev->index);
> > +   rvdev->dev.parent = rproc->dev.parent;
> > +   rvdev->dev.release = rproc_rvdev_release;
> > +   dev_set_name(&rvdev->dev, "%s#%s", dev_name(rvdev-
> >dev.parent), name);
> > +   dev_set_drvdata(&rvdev->dev, rvdev);
> > +   dma_set_coherent_mask(&rvdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > +
> > +   ret = device_register(&rvdev->dev);
> > +   if (ret)
> > +           goto free_rvdev;
> > +
> >     /* parse the vrings */
> >     for (i = 0; i < rsc->num_of_vrings; i++) {
> >             ret = rproc_parse_vring(rvdev, rsc, i);
> > @@ -518,7 +547,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc,
> struct fw_rsc_vdev *rsc,
> >     for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> >             rproc_free_vring(&rvdev->vring[i]);
> >  free_rvdev:
> > -   kfree(rvdev);
> > +   device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> >     return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -536,7 +565,7 @@ void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref)
> >
> >     rproc_remove_subdev(rproc, &rvdev->subdev);
> >     list_del(&rvdev->node);
> > -   kfree(rvdev);
> > +   device_unregister(&rvdev->dev);
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > index f6cad24..bfeacfd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct dentry *rproc_create_trace_file(const char
> *name, struct rproc *rproc,
> >  int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i);
> >
> >  void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len);
> > +phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr);
> >  int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc);
> >
> >  int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > index de21f62..9ee63c0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
> > @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
> >   * GNU General Public License for more details.
> >   */
> >
> > +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> >  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> >  #include <linux/virtio.h>
> >  #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
> > @@ -315,10 +317,48 @@ static void rproc_virtio_dev_release(struct device
> *dev)
> >  int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id)
> >  {
> >     struct rproc *rproc = rvdev->rproc;
> > -   struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> > +   struct device *dev = &rvdev->dev;
> >     struct virtio_device *vdev = &rvdev->vdev;
> > +   struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> >     int ret;
> >
> > +   /* Try to find dedicated vdev buffer carveout */
> > +   mem = rproc_find_carveout_by_name(rproc, "vdev%dbuffer",
> rvdev->index);
> > +   if (mem) {
> > +           phys_addr_t pa;
> > +
> > +           if (mem->of_resm_idx != -1) {
> > +                   struct device_node *np = rproc->dev.parent-
> >of_node;
> > +
> > +                   /* Associate reserved memory to vdev device */
> > +                   ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np,
> > +                                                            mem-
> >of_resm_idx);
> > +                   if (ret) {
> > +                           dev_err(dev, "Can't associate reserved
> memory\n");
> > +                           goto out;
> > +                   }
> > +           } else {
> > +                   if (mem->va) {
> > +                           dev_warn(dev, "vdev %d buffer already
> mapped\n",
> > +                                    rvdev->index);
> > +                           pa = rproc_va_to_pa(mem->va);
> > +                   } else {
> > +                           /* Use dma address as carveout no
> memmapped yet */
> > +                           pa = (phys_addr_t)mem->dma;
> > +                   }
> > +
> > +                   /* Associate vdev buffer memory pool to vdev
> subdev */
> > +                   ret = dmam_declare_coherent_memory(dev, pa,
> > +                                                      mem->da,
> > +                                                      mem->len,
> > +
> DMA_MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE);
> 
> Is it not possible to associate the dma_mem with vdev->dev directly,
> instead of injecting yet another device in-between the remoteproc
> platform device and the virtio device?

Thank you for the review.
I'll check how to use virtio device. An additional ops for memory registration 
may be needed at virtio level. 

> 
> That way the resulting allocation in e.g. virtio_rpmsg would be on the
> virtio device itself, not its parent.
Yes agree, it will simplify allocation/inheritance...

Regards,
Loic
> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 
> > +                   if (ret < 0) {
> > +                           dev_err(dev, "Failed to associate buffer\n");
> > +                           goto out;
> > +                   }
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +
> >     vdev->id.device = id,
> >     vdev->config = &rproc_virtio_config_ops,
> >     vdev->dev.parent = dev;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > index 6b3a234..2921dd2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > @@ -547,6 +547,7 @@ struct rproc_vdev {
> >     struct kref refcount;
> >
> >     struct rproc_subdev subdev;
> > +   struct device dev;
> >
> >     unsigned int id;
> >     struct list_head node;
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >

Reply via email to