Hi Babu,
On 10/11/2018 1:33 PM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> @@ -883,20 +883,20 @@ static int __init intel_rdt_late_init(void)
> rdt_online = state;
>
> for_each_alloc_capable_rdt_resource(r)
> - pr_info("Intel RDT %s allocation detected\n", r->name);
> + pr_info("RESCTRL %s allocation detected\n", r->name);
>
> for_each_mon_capable_rdt_resource(r)
> - pr_info("Intel RDT %s monitoring detected\n", r->name);
> + pr_info("RESCTRL %s monitoring detected\n", r->name);
>
I'm sorry - I know it was me who suggested the change to RESCTRL but I
clearly did not consider the final result which is (for example):
resctrl: RESCTRL %s allocation detected
Perhaps we could just drop that RESCTRL text?
Reinette
