On Monday 15 October 2018 03:12 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
> Hi Sekhar,
> 
> On Monday 15 October 2018 01:53 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> 
> [...]
>>>  
>>> +static irqreturn_t omap2_mcspi_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> +   struct omap2_mcspi *mcspi = data;
>>> +   u32 irqstat;
>>> +
>>> +   irqstat = mcspi_read_reg(mcspi->master, OMAP2_MCSPI_IRQSTATUS);
>>> +   if (!irqstat)
>>> +           return IRQ_NONE;
>>> +
>>> +   /* Disable IRQ and wakeup slave xfer task */
>>> +   mcspi_write_reg(mcspi->master, OMAP2_MCSPI_IRQENABLE, 0);
>>> +   if (irqstat & OMAP2_MCSPI_IRQSTATUS_EOW)
>>> +           complete(&mcspi->txdone);
>>> +
>>> +   return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>
>> You need to have the:
>>
>> pm_runtime_get_sync();
>>
>> /* access registers */
>>
>> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy();
>> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend();
>>
>> sequence here. I think thats also missing from the dma callbacks.
>> Probably working by chance today.
>>
> 
> This is taken care of by the SPI core as part of __spi_pump_messages():
> pm_runtime_get_sync()
> ...
> spi_transfer_one_message
> ...
>       omap2_mcspi_transfer_one
>       ...
>               omap2_mcspi_txrx_dma
> 
> So, both in dma callbacks and in IRQ handler, SPI controller is in
> active state.

Ah, okay then. False alarm :)

Regards,
Sekhar

Reply via email to