Hi, Andrea,

On 16.10.2018 15:49, Andrea Parri wrote:
> Hi Kirill,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 08:46:56PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> This will allow to use generic refcount_t interfaces
>> to check counters overflow instead of currently existing
>> VM_BUG_ON(). The only difference after the patch is
>> VM_BUG_ON() may cause BUG(), while refcount_t fires
>> with WARN().
> 
> refcount_{sub_and_test,inc_not_zero}() are documented to provide
> "slightly" more relaxed ordering than their atomic_* counterpart,
> c.f.,
> 
>   Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
>   lib/refcount.c (inline comments)
> 
> IIUC, this semantic change won't cause problems here (but please
> double-check? ;D ).

I just don't see a place, where we may think about using a modification
of struct mem_cgroup::id::ref as a memory barrier to order something,
and all this looks safe for me.

Kirill
 
>> But this seems not to be significant here,
>> since such the problems are usually caught by syzbot
>> with panic-on-warn enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |    2 +-
>>  mm/memcontrol.c            |   10 ++++------
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
>> index 4399cc3f00e4..7ab2120155a4 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
>> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie {
>>  
>>  struct mem_cgroup_id {
>>      int id;
>> -    atomic_t ref;
>> +    refcount_t ref;
>>  };
>>  
>>  /*
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index 7bebe2ddec05..aa728d5b3d72 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -4299,14 +4299,12 @@ static void mem_cgroup_id_remove(struct mem_cgroup 
>> *memcg)
>>  
>>  static void mem_cgroup_id_get_many(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int n)
>>  {
>> -    VM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&memcg->id.ref) <= 0);
>> -    atomic_add(n, &memcg->id.ref);
>> +    refcount_add(n, &memcg->id.ref);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void mem_cgroup_id_put_many(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int n)
>>  {
>> -    VM_BUG_ON(atomic_read(&memcg->id.ref) < n);
>> -    if (atomic_sub_and_test(n, &memcg->id.ref)) {
>> +    if (refcount_sub_and_test(n, &memcg->id.ref)) {
>>              mem_cgroup_id_remove(memcg);
>>  
>>              /* Memcg ID pins CSS */
>> @@ -4523,7 +4521,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_css_online(struct 
>> cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>>      }
>>  
>>      /* Online state pins memcg ID, memcg ID pins CSS */
>> -    atomic_set(&memcg->id.ref, 1);
>> +    refcount_set(&memcg->id.ref, 1);
>>      css_get(css);
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -6357,7 +6355,7 @@ subsys_initcall(mem_cgroup_init);
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_SWAP
>>  static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_id_get_online(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>>  {
>> -    while (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&memcg->id.ref)) {
>> +    while (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&memcg->id.ref)) {
>>              /*
>>               * The root cgroup cannot be destroyed, so it's refcount must
>>               * always be >= 1.
>>

Reply via email to