From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
Static analysis with CoverityScan is throwing warnings that specific
case statements are missing breaks. Rather than adding breaks, add
return -EINVAL to the specific case statements to clarify the
error return paths. Fix also saves 50 bytes.
Before:
text data bss dec hex filename
21418 4936 128 26482 6772 drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.o
After:
dec hex filename
21370 4936 128 26434 6742 drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.o
(gcc 8.2, x86-64)
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1462408 ("Missing break in switch")
---
V2: use returns instead of break statements to keep with the
current style used in the switch statement.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
---
drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
index d1239624187d..bdd7cba6f6b0 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static int ina2xx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
*val2 = chip->shunt_resistor_uohm;
return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
}
+ return -EINVAL;
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN:
switch (chan->address) {
@@ -262,6 +263,7 @@ static int ina2xx_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
*val = chip->range_vbus == 32 ? 1 : 2;
return IIO_VAL_INT;
}
+ return -EINVAL;
}
return -EINVAL;
--
2.19.1
