On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Alessandro Rubini wrote: > OTOH I admit you can compare any value with -EINVAL, after PTR_ERR. > But in general you first detect the error condition and then split > among error (or print a message according to the exact value.
if (IS_ERR(p) && PTR_ERR(p) == -ENOENT) instead of if (p == ERR_PTR(-ENOENT)) is ugly, obfuscating what's going on for no good reason and I'm going to keep killing those every time I run into one...