On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir7...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone tell me what the expected behavior of a nested > mutex_lock_interruptible(&lock); ? > > Why does the reproducer only warn and not really deadlock. > It is because that is considered the lesser evil? > and obviously, then inner unlock releases the outer lock? No, it's not the same lock, just the same lock class (first one is OVL_I(d_inode(old))->lock, the other is OVL_I(d_inode(new->d_parent)))->lock). So we could possibly get away with annotating with mutex_lock_nested(). Is this the only place that ovl_i_lock is nested? Thanks, Miklos
