Hi Stephen On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 12:35 AM Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> wrote: > > Quoting Ricardo Ribalda Delgado (2018-11-01 07:40:39) > > All Tull reported that there might be a great ammount of drivers with > > imbalance on clk_add_provider. This is an issue for Device tree overlays > > (and also a bug) https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/18/1103 > > > > This patchset implement a devm_ function of of_clk_add_provider, and > > fixes 3 drivers. > > > > Drivers like clk-gpio will be easily fixed with coccinelle if this set > > is accepted. (I volunteer, I want to learn how to use it, just seen the > > great presentations from Julia). > > We already have devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(), so any instances of > of_clk_add_provider() should be replaced with that, instead of > propagating the usage of of_clk_add_provider() any further. I'll gladly > apply patches to convert drivers from struct clk based APIs to struct > clk_hw based APIs so that we can clearly split clk providers from clk > consumers. So if you're interested in working on some coccinelle script > for that it would be great! >
Will look into that. Can you take a look to 1/5 of this patchset? I believe that it is valid even if we do not take 2-5. Cheers -- Ricardo Ribalda
