Hi Rasmus, On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 2:06 PM Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> wrote: > > I did quick check and gcc >= 4.1, clang >= 3.0, icc >= 13 compilers > seem to support it (or at least recognize it, even if they just ignore > it), so we do not need to make it optional, no? Did I miss some case?
compiler-attributes landed -- do you want to do the v2 of this (i.e. #defining it unconditionally) or you prefer I simply fix up the patch? (I will improve the docs as well in another patch about the "optional" naming). Cheers, Miguel
