Hello Michal,
just to state it more explicitly, I think the following patch (not even
compile tested) is much preferable over your approach:
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
index 1d5242c9cde0..af88644b5efb 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
@@ -216,7 +216,14 @@ static int imx_pwm_apply_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
pwm_device *pwm,
cr |= MX3_PWMCR_POUTC;
writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
- } else if (cstate.enabled) {
+ } else if (cstate.enabled && state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) {
+ /*
+ * When disabled in hardware the output pin goes to 0
+ * independant of the polarity setting. The expectation of some
+ * people however is that after disabling the pin goes to the
+ * inactive level which isn't given for an inversed pwm, so
+ * only disable for normal polarity.
+ */
writel(0, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
I think it solves most if not all problems you want to address with the
pinctrl stuff.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
