On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 08:15:00AM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> Intel Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET) introduces the
> following MSRs into the XSAVES system states.
>
> IA32_U_CET (user-mode CET settings),
> IA32_PL3_SSP (user-mode shadow stack),
> IA32_PL0_SSP (kernel-mode shadow stack),
> IA32_PL1_SSP (ring-1 shadow stack),
> IA32_PL2_SSP (ring-2 shadow stack).
And?
That commit message got chopped off here, it seems.
> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng...@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h | 4 +++-
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/processor-flags.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h
> index 202c53918ecf..e55d51d172f1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h
> @@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ enum xfeature {
> XFEATURE_Hi16_ZMM,
> XFEATURE_PT_UNIMPLEMENTED_SO_FAR,
> XFEATURE_PKRU,
> + XFEATURE_RESERVED,
> + XFEATURE_SHSTK_USER,
> + XFEATURE_SHSTK_KERNEL,
>
> XFEATURE_MAX,
> };
> @@ -128,6 +131,8 @@ enum xfeature {
> #define XFEATURE_MASK_Hi16_ZMM (1 << XFEATURE_Hi16_ZMM)
> #define XFEATURE_MASK_PT (1 << XFEATURE_PT_UNIMPLEMENTED_SO_FAR)
> #define XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU (1 << XFEATURE_PKRU)
> +#define XFEATURE_MASK_SHSTK_USER (1 << XFEATURE_SHSTK_USER)
> +#define XFEATURE_MASK_SHSTK_KERNEL (1 << XFEATURE_SHSTK_KERNEL)
>
> #define XFEATURE_MASK_FPSSE (XFEATURE_MASK_FP | XFEATURE_MASK_SSE)
> #define XFEATURE_MASK_AVX512 (XFEATURE_MASK_OPMASK \
> @@ -229,6 +234,23 @@ struct pkru_state {
> u32 pad;
> } __packed;
>
> +/*
> + * State component 11 is Control flow Enforcement user states
Why the Camel-cased naming?
"Control" then "flow" then capitalized again "Enforcement".
Fix all occurrences pls, especially the user-visible strings.
> + */
> +struct cet_user_state {
> + u64 u_cet; /* user control flow settings */
> + u64 user_ssp; /* user shadow stack pointer */
Prefix both with "usr_" instead.
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/*
> + * State component 12 is Control flow Enforcement kernel states
> + */
> +struct cet_kernel_state {
> + u64 kernel_ssp; /* kernel shadow stack */
> + u64 pl1_ssp; /* ring-1 shadow stack */
> + u64 pl2_ssp; /* ring-2 shadow stack */
Just write "privilege level" everywhere - not "ring".
Btw, do you see how the type and the name of all those other fields in
that file are tabulated? Except yours...
> +} __packed;
> +
> struct xstate_header {
> u64 xfeatures;
> u64 xcomp_bv;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
> index d8e2ec99f635..18b60748a34d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,9 @@
> XFEATURE_MASK_Hi16_ZMM | \
> XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU | \
> XFEATURE_MASK_BNDREGS | \
> - XFEATURE_MASK_BNDCSR)
> + XFEATURE_MASK_BNDCSR | \
> + XFEATURE_MASK_SHSTK_USER | \
> + XFEATURE_MASK_SHSTK_KERNEL)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> #define REX_PREFIX "0x48, "
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/processor-flags.h
> b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/processor-flags.h
> index bcba3c643e63..25311ec4b731 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/processor-flags.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/processor-flags.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,8 @@
> #define X86_CR4_SMAP _BITUL(X86_CR4_SMAP_BIT)
> #define X86_CR4_PKE_BIT 22 /* enable Protection Keys support */
> #define X86_CR4_PKE _BITUL(X86_CR4_PKE_BIT)
> +#define X86_CR4_CET_BIT 23 /* enable Control flow Enforcement */
> +#define X86_CR4_CET _BITUL(X86_CR4_CET_BIT)
>
> /*
> * x86-64 Task Priority Register, CR8
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> index 605ec6decf3e..ad36ea28bfd1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ static const char *xfeature_names[] =
> "Processor Trace (unused)" ,
> "Protection Keys User registers",
> "unknown xstate feature" ,
> + "Control flow User registers" ,
> + "Control flow Kernel registers" ,
> + "unknown xstate feature" ,
So there are two "unknown xstate feature" array elems now...
> static short xsave_cpuid_features[] __initdata = {
> @@ -48,6 +51,9 @@ static short xsave_cpuid_features[] __initdata = {
> X86_FEATURE_AVX512F,
> X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT,
> X86_FEATURE_PKU,
> + 0, /* Unused */
What's that for?
> + X86_FEATURE_SHSTK, /* XFEATURE_SHSTK_USER */
> + X86_FEATURE_SHSTK, /* XFEATURE_SHSTK_KERNEL */
> };
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
