On 09.11.18 17:19:54, John Garry wrote: > On 07/11/2018 22:03, Robert Richter wrote:
> >Patches have been tested with Cavium ThunderX and ThunderX2. I have an > >implementation of CMA ITS table allocation on top of this series > >available, I will send out patches for this in a couple of days. > For this follow-on patchset, will it conflict with this: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/25/75 > > We were planning on reposting with some results. Both could be implemented, but of course, it changes the same code and there will be probably conflicts. -Robert