Now that synchronize_rcu() waits for preempt-disable regions of code as well as RCU read-side critical sections, synchronize_sched() can be replaced by synchronize_rcu(). This commit therefore makes this change, even though it is but a comment.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Cc: Dennis Zhou <[email protected]> Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> --- include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h index 79b99d653e03..71b75643c432 100644 --- a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h +++ b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline void percpu_down_read_preempt_disable(struct percpu_rw_semaphore * * cannot both change sem->state from readers_fast and start checking * counters while we are here. So if we see !sem->state, we know that * the writer won't be checking until we're past the preempt_enable() - * and that one the synchronize_sched() is done, the writer will see + * and that once the synchronize_rcu() is done, the writer will see * anything we did within this RCU-sched read-size critical section. */ __this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count); -- 2.17.1
