3.16.61-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <[email protected]>

commit 9ada8c582088d32bd5c071c17213bc6edf37443a upstream.

If usb_gadget_giveback_request() is called in usb_ep_queue(),
this printer_write() is possible to cause spinlock recursion. So,
this patch adds spin_unlock() before calls usb_ep_queue() to avoid it.

Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust filename]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/usb/gadget/printer.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/printer.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/printer.c
@@ -587,6 +587,7 @@ printer_write(struct file *fd, const cha
        size_t                  size;   /* Amount of data in a TX request. */
        size_t                  bytes_copied = 0;
        struct usb_request      *req;
+       int                     value;
 
        DBG(dev, "printer_write trying to send %d bytes\n", (int)len);
 
@@ -666,7 +667,11 @@ printer_write(struct file *fd, const cha
                        return -EAGAIN;
                }
 
-               if (usb_ep_queue(dev->in_ep, req, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
+               /* here, we unlock, and only unlock, to avoid deadlock. */
+               spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
+               value = usb_ep_queue(dev->in_ep, req, GFP_ATOMIC);
+               spin_lock(&dev->lock);
+               if (value) {
                        list_add(&req->list, &dev->tx_reqs);
                        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
                        mutex_unlock(&dev->lock_printer_io);

Reply via email to