3.16.61-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.moduk...@gmail.com>

commit d0eb06afe712b7b103b6361f40a9a0c638524669 upstream.

Alter the state-check assertion in fscache_enqueue_operation() to allow
cancelled operations to be given processing time so they can be cleaned up.

Also fix a debugging statement that was requiring such operations to have
an object assigned.

Fixes: 9ae326a69004 ("CacheFiles: A cache that backs onto a mounted filesystem")
Reported-by: Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.moduk...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 fs/fscache/operation.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/fscache/operation.c
+++ b/fs/fscache/operation.c
@@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ void fscache_enqueue_operation(struct fs
        ASSERT(op->processor != NULL);
        ASSERT(fscache_object_is_available(op->object));
        ASSERTCMP(atomic_read(&op->usage), >, 0);
-       ASSERTCMP(op->state, ==, FSCACHE_OP_ST_IN_PROGRESS);
+       ASSERTIFCMP(op->state != FSCACHE_OP_ST_IN_PROGRESS,
+                   op->state, ==,  FSCACHE_OP_ST_CANCELLED);
 
        fscache_stat(&fscache_n_op_enqueue);
        switch (op->flags & FSCACHE_OP_TYPE) {
@@ -401,7 +402,8 @@ void fscache_put_operation(struct fscach
        struct fscache_cache *cache;
 
        _enter("{OBJ%x OP%x,%d}",
-              op->object->debug_id, op->debug_id, atomic_read(&op->usage));
+              op->object ? op->object->debug_id : 0,
+              op->debug_id, atomic_read(&op->usage));
 
        ASSERTCMP(atomic_read(&op->usage), >, 0);
 

Reply via email to