3.16.61-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com>

commit 8234caed27f7bce141c9fb1f7e76c91a2a66d248 upstream.

The regmap_config struct may be const because it is not modified by the
driver and regmap_init() accepts pointer to const.

Replace doubled const in the arrays of clock names with proper const
pointer to const data. This fixes the warnings:

drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c:71:25: warning: duplicate const
drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c:74:25: warning: duplicate const
drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c:77:25: warning: duplicate const
drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c:80:25: warning: duplicate const

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c
@@ -68,16 +68,16 @@ struct si5351_driver_data {
        struct si5351_hw_data   *clkout;
 };
 
-static const char const *si5351_input_names[] = {
+static const char * const si5351_input_names[] = {
        "xtal", "clkin"
 };
-static const char const *si5351_pll_names[] = {
+static const char * const si5351_pll_names[] = {
        "plla", "pllb", "vxco"
 };
-static const char const *si5351_msynth_names[] = {
+static const char * const si5351_msynth_names[] = {
        "ms0", "ms1", "ms2", "ms3", "ms4", "ms5", "ms6", "ms7"
 };
-static const char const *si5351_clkout_names[] = {
+static const char * const si5351_clkout_names[] = {
        "clk0", "clk1", "clk2", "clk3", "clk4", "clk5", "clk6", "clk7"
 };
 
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static bool si5351_regmap_is_writeable(s
        return true;
 }
 
-static struct regmap_config si5351_regmap_config = {
+static const struct regmap_config si5351_regmap_config = {
        .reg_bits = 8,
        .val_bits = 8,
        .cache_type = REGCACHE_RBTREE,

Reply via email to