4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> commit 545e3366db823dc3342ca9d7fea803f829c9062f upstream. Allocating new chunks modifies both the extent and chunk tree, which can trigger new chunk allocations. So instead of doing list_for_each_safe, just do while (!list_empty()) so we make sure we don't exit with other pending bg's still on our list. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -10270,7 +10270,7 @@ error: void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) { - struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group, *tmp; + struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group; struct btrfs_root *extent_root = fs_info->extent_root; struct btrfs_block_group_item item; struct btrfs_key key; @@ -10278,7 +10278,10 @@ void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(s bool can_flush_pending_bgs = trans->can_flush_pending_bgs; trans->can_flush_pending_bgs = false; - list_for_each_entry_safe(block_group, tmp, &trans->new_bgs, bg_list) { + while (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) { + block_group = list_first_entry(&trans->new_bgs, + struct btrfs_block_group_cache, + bg_list); if (ret) goto next;
