From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>

[ Upstream commit 8c6c9bed8773375b1d54ccca2911ec892c59db5d ]

There is a null check on dst_file->private data which suggests
it can be potentially null. However, before this check, pointer
smb_file_target is derived from dst_file->private and dereferenced
in the call to tlink_tcon, hence there is a potential null pointer
deference.

Fix this by assigning smb_file_target and target_tcon after the
null pointer sanity checks.

Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1475302 ("Dereference before null check")

Fixes: 04b38d601239 ("vfs: pull btrfs clone API to vfs layer")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfre...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
index 44a7b2dea688..c5fd5abf7206 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -933,8 +933,8 @@ static int cifs_clone_file_range(struct file *src_file, 
loff_t off,
        struct inode *src_inode = file_inode(src_file);
        struct inode *target_inode = file_inode(dst_file);
        struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_src = src_file->private_data;
-       struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_target = dst_file->private_data;
-       struct cifs_tcon *target_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_target->tlink);
+       struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_target;
+       struct cifs_tcon *target_tcon;
        unsigned int xid;
        int rc;
 
@@ -948,6 +948,9 @@ static int cifs_clone_file_range(struct file *src_file, 
loff_t off,
                goto out;
        }
 
+       smb_file_target = dst_file->private_data;
+       target_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_target->tlink);
+
        /*
         * Note: cifs case is easier than btrfs since server responsible for
         * checks for proper open modes and file type and if it wants
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to