On 11/16/2018 02:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
> 
> __dump_page prints the mapping pointer but that is quite unhelpful
> for many reports because the pointer itself only helps to distinguish
> anon/ksm mappings from other ones (because of lowest bits
> set). Sometimes it would be much more helpful to know what kind of
> mapping that is actually and if we know this is a file mapping then also
> try to resolve the dentry name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/debug.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/debug.c b/mm/debug.c
> index cdacba12e09a..a33177bfc856 100644
> --- a/mm/debug.c
> +++ b/mm/debug.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ const struct trace_print_flags vmaflag_names[] = {
>  
>  void __dump_page(struct page *page, const char *reason)
>  {
> +     struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
>       bool page_poisoned = PagePoisoned(page);
>       int mapcount;
>  
> @@ -70,6 +71,18 @@ void __dump_page(struct page *page, const char *reason)
>       if (PageCompound(page))
>               pr_cont(" compound_mapcount: %d", compound_mapcount(page));
>       pr_cont("\n");
> +     if (PageAnon(page))
> +             pr_emerg("anon ");
> +     else if (PageKsm(page))
> +             pr_emerg("ksm ");
> +     else if (mapping) {
> +             pr_emerg("%ps ", mapping->a_ops);
> +             if (mapping->host->i_dentry.first) {
> +                     struct dentry *dentry;
> +                     dentry = container_of(mapping->host->i_dentry.first, 
> struct dentry, d_u.d_alias);
> +                     pr_emerg("name:\"%*s\" ", dentry->d_name.len, 
> dentry->d_name.name);
> +             }
> +     }
>       BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(pageflag_names) != __NR_PAGEFLAGS + 1);
>  
>       pr_emerg("flags: %#lx(%pGp)\n", page->flags, &page->flags);
> 

Differentiating between anon, ksm mapping and going till dentry information
for file mappings is surely an improvement. 

Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]>

Reply via email to