On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:24:03PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:07:14PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > Yes, I think it could be renamed as sgx.c. Should the driver part be > > also called as sgx.ko? > > I guess that's your call guys. The reason why I asked is because I like > shorter names and "sgx" is unambiguous enough. AFAICT, there's no one > else doing SGX atm. > > :-)
We go with that! Thanks for the feedback. /Jarkko
