On 16/11/18 6:58 PM, Anisse Astier wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:07:29PM +0200, Anisse Astier wrote:
>> If there's no ACPI DSM for voltage switch, it will just cause a lot of
>> debug info down the line, we only need one at startup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier <ani...@astier.eu>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>> index f2c1fb339d66..95fdbb883c7e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>> @@ -723,6 +723,7 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id board_no_1_8v[] = {
>> static void byt_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
>> {
>> struct mmc_host_ops *ops = &slot->host->mmc_host_ops;
>> + struct intel_host *intel_host = sdhci_pci_priv(slot);
>>
>> byt_read_dsm(slot);
>>
>> @@ -733,6 +734,16 @@ static void byt_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
>> mmc_hostname(slot->host->mmc));
>> slot->host->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V;
>> }
>> + /* Check if we have the appropriate voltage switch DSM methods */
>> + if (!(intel_host->dsm_fns & (1 << INTEL_DSM_V18_SWITCH)) &&
>> + !(intel_host->dsm_fns & (1 << INTEL_DSM_V33_SWITCH))) {
>> + /* No voltage switching supported at all, there's no
>> + * point in installing the callback: return.
>> + */
>> + pr_debug("%s: No voltage switching ACPI DSM helper\n",
>> + mmc_hostname(slot->host->mmc));
>> + return;
>> + }
>> ops->start_signal_voltage_switch = intel_start_signal_voltage_switch;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.2
>>
>
> What do you think of picking this last patch ? Or maybe you had
> different cleanups in mind when you said you wanted to rework this ?
Voltage switches are relatively rare, and dynamic debug allows control over
exactly which debug messages display, so I am not sure this patch is needed.
