3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
commit ccd3c4373eacb044eb3832966299d13d2631f66f upstream.
The code cleaning transaction's lists of checkpoint buffers has a bug
where it increases bh refcount only after releasing
journal->j_list_lock. Thus the following race is possible:
CPU0 CPU1
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()
jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers()
__journal_try_to_free_buffer(bh)
...
while (transaction->t_checkpoint_io_list)
...
if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
<-- IO completes now, buffer gets unlocked -->
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh);
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
try_to_free_buffers(page);
get_bh(bh) <-- accesses freed bh
Fix the problem by grabbing bh reference before unlocking
journal->j_list_lock.
Fixes: dc6e8d669cf5 ("jbd2: don't call get_bh() before calling
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint()")
Fixes: be1158cc615f ("jbd2: fold __process_buffer() into
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()")
Reported-by: syzbot+7f4a27091759e2fe7...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczer...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
@@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ restart:
bh = jh2bh(jh);
if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
- spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
get_bh(bh);
+ spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
wait_on_buffer(bh);
/* the journal_head may have gone by now */
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "brelse");
@@ -336,8 +336,8 @@ restart2:
jh = transaction->t_checkpoint_io_list;
bh = jh2bh(jh);
if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
- spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
get_bh(bh);
+ spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
wait_on_buffer(bh);
/* the journal_head may have gone by now */
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "brelse");
