On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 14:23 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > lguest-export-symbols-for-lguest-as-a-module.patch > > __put_task_struct is one of those no way in hell should this be exported > things because we don't want modules messing with task lifetimes. > > Fortunately I can't find anything actually using this in lguest, so > it looks the issue has been solved in the meantime.
To do inter-guest (ie. inter-process) I/O you really have to make sure the other side doesn't go away. > I also have a rather bad feeling about exporting access_process_vm. > This is the proverbial sledge hammer for access to user vm addresses > and I'd rather keep it away from module programmers with "if all > you have is a hammer ..." in mind. > > In lguest this is used by send_dma which from my short reading of the > code seems to be the central IPC mechanism. The double copy here > doesn't look very efficient to me either. Maybe some VM folks could > look into a better way to archive this that might be both more > efficient and not require the export. It's not a double copy: it's a map & copy. If KVM develops inter-guest I/O then this could all be extracted into a helper function and made more efficient. > Just started to reading this (again) so no useful comment here, but it > would be nice if the code could follow CodingStyle and place the || and > && at the end of the line in multiline conditionals instead of at the > beginning of the new one. Surprisingly, you have a point here. Since the key purpose of lguest is as demonstration code, it meticulously match kernel style. I shall immediately prepare a patch to convert the rest of the kernel to the correct "&& at beginning of line" style. Rusty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/