On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 10:14:42 +0300
Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:

> We should return "ret" as-is.  The "newdev" variable is a valid pointer.
> 
> Fixes: 3a379bbcea0a ("i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>

Queued to i3c/next.

Thanks,

Boris

> ---
>  drivers/i3c/master.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index 0ea7bb045fad..bda4b9613e53 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -1823,10 +1823,8 @@ int i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked(struct 
> i3c_master_controller *master,
>               return PTR_ERR(newdev);
>  
>       ret = i3c_master_attach_i3c_dev(master, newdev);
> -     if (ret) {
> -             ret = PTR_ERR(newdev);
> +     if (ret)
>               goto err_free_dev;
> -     }
>  
>       ret = i3c_master_retrieve_dev_info(newdev);
>       if (ret)

Reply via email to