On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:27:02AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote: > is highly debatable). I also seem to remember that there might also be > cases where DT values cannot be changed at all for a (new?) platform > that happens to be using DTs shipped with an old revision; something > along these lines was mentioned (by Mark?) during the review process, > but exact details escape my mind ATM, apologies.
Yeah, DTs might be in firmware which is either non-updatable or which people are reluctant to update due to it not being recoverable if the update goes wrong.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature