On 11/20/18 10:18 PM, Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > > Russell, > > I have tried to place MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS in the best available > header for each architecture, considering different paging levels, PAE > existence, and existing similar definitions. Also, I have only > considered those architectures already having "sparsemem.h" header. > > Would you mind reviewing it ?
Should I re-send the this v2 (as v3) with complete list of get_maintainer.pl ? I was in doubt because I'm touching headers from several archs and I'm not sure who, if it is accepted, would merge it. Thank you -- Rafael D. Tinoco Linaro Kernel Validation
