On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:43:50AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Use the gpiod_get_from_of_node() rather than the devm_*
> version so that the regulator core can handle the lifecycle
> of these descriptors.
> 
> This patch requires "gpio: Export gpiod_get_from_of_node()"
> to be applied first.
> 
> Fixes: 3012e81446d0 ("regulator: tps65090: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO 
> number")
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c 
> b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> index db714d5edafc..223f6974a9f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> @@ -376,11 +376,11 @@ static struct tps65090_platform_data 
> *tps65090_parse_dt_reg_data(
>                               gflags = GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
>                       gflags |= GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE;
>  
> -                     rpdata->gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(&pdev->dev,
> -                                                                 
> tps65090_matches[idx].of_node,
> -                                                                 
> "dcdc-ext-control-gpios", 0,
> -                                                                 gflags,
> -                                                                 "tps65090");
> +                     rpdata->gpiod = gpiod_get_from_of_node(
> +                                             tps65090_matches[idx].of_node,
> +                                             "dcdc-ext-control-gpios", 0,
> +                                             gflags,
> +                                             "tps65090");
>                       if (IS_ERR(rpdata->gpiod))
>                               return ERR_CAST(rpdata->gpiod);
>                       if (!rpdata->gpiod)

This one needs some handling to avoid leaking the gpio too.

Thanks,
Charles

Reply via email to