[PATCH 14/27] locking/lockdep: Remove a superfluous INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement

[Bart Van Assche]

Initializing a list entry just before it is passed to list_add_tail_rcu()
is not necessary because list_add_tail_rcu() overwrites the next and prev
pointers anyway. Hence remove the INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 41fd3b279220..83ffcc7f1ced 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -790,7 +790,6 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int 
subclass, int force)
        class->key = key;
        class->name = lock->name;
        class->subclass = subclass;
-       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->lock_entry);
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_before);
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_after);
        class->name_version = count_matching_names(class);
-- 
2.20.0.rc0.387.gc7a69e6b6c-goog