Hi Dan,

On 29/11/18 12:21, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Enric,
> 
> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> 
> url:    
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Enric-Balletbo-i-Serra/mfd-cros_ec-use-devm_mfd_add_devices/20181123-025253
> 
> smatch warnings:
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sysfs.c:366 cros_ec_sysfs_probe() warn: 
> variable dereferenced before check 'ec_dev' (see line 362)
> 
> # 
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b3074e331f36fff8890e7bd5c1f5874f4c59d38f
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git remote update linux-review
> git checkout b3074e331f36fff8890e7bd5c1f5874f4c59d38f
> vim +/ec_dev +366 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_sysfs.c
> 
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22  358  
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22  359  static int 
> cros_ec_sysfs_probe(struct platform_device *pd)
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22  360  {
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22  361       struct cros_ec_dev 
> *ec_dev = dev_get_drvdata(pd->dev.parent);
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22 @362       struct cros_ec_platform 
> *ec_platform = dev_get_platdata(ec_dev->dev);
>                                                                               
>                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22  363       struct device *dev = 
> &pd->dev;
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22  364       int ret;
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22  365  
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22 @366       if (!ec_dev) {
>                                                              ^^^^^^
> Presumable this test can be removed?
> 

Yes, Guenter detected this and I already sent another patchset that removes
this. Thanks.

> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22  367               dev_err(dev, 
> "No EC dev found\n");
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22  368               return -EINVAL;
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22  369       }
> b3074e33 Enric Balletbo i Serra 2018-11-22  370  
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
> 

I had this question on my mind for some time but I didn't look for an answer, in
fact, I'm not sure if I already asked you this before, sorry about that if I
did, the question is. There is a easy way to run your smatch scripts locally to
check the patch before I send to the ML?

Best regards,
 Enric

Reply via email to