Quoting Douglas Anderson (2018-11-27 11:24:43) > The #reset-cells was listed as optional in the bindings for > qcom,sdm845-videocc. There's no reason for it to be optional. As per > Stephen [1]: > > > We should update the binding to make it a required property. It > > doesn't make any sense why that property would be optional given > > that the hardware either has support for resets or it doesn't. > > sdm845 support is still in its infancy so we shouldn't be affecting > any real device trees by modifying the bindings here. > > [1] > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/154330186815.88331.12720647562079303...@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com > > Fixes: 84b66b211603 ("dt-bindings: clock: Introduce QCOM Video clock > bindings") > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]> > ---
Applied to clk-next
