On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:47:31PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> @@ -379,6 +398,14 @@ void kvm_hv_synic_send_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int
> vector)
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(synic->sint); i++)
> if (synic_get_sint_vector(synic_read_sint(synic, i)) == vector)
> kvm_hv_notify_acked_sint(vcpu, i);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hv_vcpu->stimer); i++) {
> + stimer = &hv_vcpu->stimer[i];
> + if (stimer->msg_pending && stimer->config.enable &&
> + stimer->config.direct_mode &&
> + stimer->config.apic_vector == vector)
> + stimer_mark_pending(stimer, false);
> + }
> }
While debugging another issue with synic timers, it just occurred to me
that with direct timers no extra processing is necessary on EOI: unlike
traditional synic timers which may have failed to deliver a message and
want to be notified when they can retry, direct timers just set the irq
directly in the apic.
So this hunk shouldn't be needed, should it?
Roman.
