On (12/02/18 14:02), Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>  
> @@ -1541,11 +1545,13 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len, 
> int source)
>               } else {
>                       u64 seq = syslog_seq;
>                       u32 idx = syslog_idx;
> +                     bool f = syslog_partial ? syslog_time : printk_time;
                        ^^^^^^

>                       while (seq < log_next_seq) {
>                               struct printk_log *msg = log_from_idx(idx);
>  
> -                             error += msg_print_text(msg, true, NULL, 0);
> +                             error += msg_print_text(msg, true, f, NULL, 0);
                                                                ^^^^

> +                             f = printk_time;
                                ^^^

>                               idx = log_next(idx);
>                               seq++;

Can we please have something better than 'f'?

        -ss

Reply via email to