4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> commit 67266c1080ad56c31af72b9c18355fde8ccc124a upstream. Currently we check the branch tracing only by checking for the PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS event of PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE type. But we can define the same event with the PERF_TYPE_RAW type. Changing the intel_pmu_has_bts() code to check on event's final hw config value, so both HW types are covered. Adding unlikely to intel_pmu_has_bts() condition calls, because it was used in the original code in intel_bts_constraints. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijls...@chello.nl> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eran...@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.wea...@maine.edu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181121101612.16272-2-jo...@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 17 +++-------------- arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 13 +++++++++---- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c @@ -2358,16 +2358,7 @@ done: static struct event_constraint * intel_bts_constraints(struct perf_event *event) { - struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; - unsigned int hw_event, bts_event; - - if (event->attr.freq) - return NULL; - - hw_event = hwc->config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK; - bts_event = x86_pmu.event_map(PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS); - - if (unlikely(hw_event == bts_event && hwc->sample_period == 1)) + if (unlikely(intel_pmu_has_bts(event))) return &bts_constraint; return NULL; @@ -2989,10 +2980,8 @@ static unsigned long intel_pmu_large_peb static int intel_pmu_bts_config(struct perf_event *event) { struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr; - struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; - if (attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS && - !attr->freq && hwc->sample_period == 1) { + if (unlikely(intel_pmu_has_bts(event))) { /* BTS is not supported by this architecture. */ if (!x86_pmu.bts_active) return -EOPNOTSUPP; @@ -3054,7 +3043,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct pe /* * BTS is set up earlier in this path, so don't account twice */ - if (!intel_pmu_has_bts(event)) { + if (!unlikely(intel_pmu_has_bts(event))) { /* disallow lbr if conflicting events are present */ if (x86_add_exclusive(x86_lbr_exclusive_lbr)) return -EBUSY; --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h @@ -857,11 +857,16 @@ static inline int amd_pmu_init(void) static inline bool intel_pmu_has_bts(struct perf_event *event) { - if (event->attr.config == PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS && - !event->attr.freq && event->hw.sample_period == 1) - return true; + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; + unsigned int hw_event, bts_event; - return false; + if (event->attr.freq) + return false; + + hw_event = hwc->config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK; + bts_event = x86_pmu.event_map(PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS); + + return hw_event == bts_event && hwc->sample_period == 1; } int intel_pmu_save_and_restart(struct perf_event *event);
