4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

commit aaa52e340073b7f4593b3c4ddafcafa70cf838b5 upstream.

Huge tmpfs testing on a shortish file mapped into a pmd-rounded extent
hit shmem_evict_inode()'s WARN_ON(inode->i_blocks) followed by
clear_inode()'s BUG_ON(inode->i_data.nrpages) when the file was later
closed and unlinked.

khugepaged's collapse_shmem() was forgetting to update mapping->nrpages
on the rollback path, after it had added but then needs to undo some
holes.

There is indeed an irritating asymmetry between shmem_charge(), whose
callers want it to increment nrpages after successfully accounting
blocks, and shmem_uncharge(), when __delete_from_page_cache() already
decremented nrpages itself: oh well, just add a comment on that to them
both.

And shmem_recalc_inode() is supposed to be called when the accounting is
expected to be in balance (so it can deduce from imbalance that reclaim
discarded some pages): so change shmem_charge() to update nrpages
earlier (though it's rare for the difference to matter at all).

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: 800d8c63b2e98 ("shmem: add huge pages support")
Fixes: f3f0e1d2150b2 ("khugepaged: add support of collapse for tmpfs/shmem 
pages")
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <[email protected]>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>    [4.8+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 mm/khugepaged.c | 4 +++-
 mm/shmem.c      | 6 +++++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 62de24194f24..3f7bfd98b0e6 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -1538,8 +1538,10 @@ static void collapse_shmem(struct mm_struct *mm,
                *hpage = NULL;
        } else {
                /* Something went wrong: rollback changes to the radix-tree */
-               shmem_uncharge(mapping->host, nr_none);
                spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+               mapping->nrpages -= nr_none;
+               shmem_uncharge(mapping->host, nr_none);
+
                radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter,
                                start) {
                        if (iter.index >= end)
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index e30ffaa065a4..54911bbc74d6 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -283,12 +283,14 @@ bool shmem_charge(struct inode *inode, long pages)
        if (!shmem_inode_acct_block(inode, pages))
                return false;
 
+       /* nrpages adjustment first, then shmem_recalc_inode() when balanced */
+       inode->i_mapping->nrpages += pages;
+
        spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock, flags);
        info->alloced += pages;
        inode->i_blocks += pages * BLOCKS_PER_PAGE;
        shmem_recalc_inode(inode);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->lock, flags);
-       inode->i_mapping->nrpages += pages;
 
        return true;
 }
@@ -298,6 +300,8 @@ void shmem_uncharge(struct inode *inode, long pages)
        struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
        unsigned long flags;
 
+       /* nrpages adjustment done by __delete_from_page_cache() or caller */
+
        spin_lock_irqsave(&info->lock, flags);
        info->alloced -= pages;
        inode->i_blocks -= pages * BLOCKS_PER_PAGE;
-- 
2.17.1



Reply via email to