On 2018-12-05 4:20 p.m., Jerome Glisse wrote: > And my proposal is under /sys/bus and have symlink to all existing > device it agregate in there. That's so not the point. Use the existing buses don't invent some virtual tree. I don't know how many times I have to say this or in how many ways. I'm not responding anymore. > So you agree with my proposal ? A sysfs directory in which all the > bus and how they are connected to each other and what is connected > to each of them (device, CPU, memory). I'm fine with the motivation. What I'm arguing against is the implementation and the fact you have to create a whole grand new userspace API and hierarchy to accomplish it. Logan
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: heterogenenous memory system... Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: heterogenenous memory s... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: heterogenenous memo... Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: heterogenenous ... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: heterogenen... Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: hetero... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: he... Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: he... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: he... Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: he... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: he... Logan Gunthorpe
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: he... Jerome Glisse
- Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] mm/hms: he... Dan Williams