On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:24:44PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Since the immediate values depend on the same int3 handler as kprobes > implements > for i386, we have to get architecture specific defines available for the > kprobes > trap handler (especially restore_interrupts()) wven when CONFIG_KPROBES is not > selected. > > That kind of ifdef around a whole header does not make sense in the first > place > anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > include/linux/kprobes.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/linux/kprobes.h > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/linux/kprobes.h 2007-07-13 > 18:47:57.000000000 -0400 > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/linux/kprobes.h 2007-07-13 18:48:45.000000000 > -0400 > @@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ > #include <linux/spinlock.h> > #include <linux/rcupdate.h> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES > #include <asm/kprobes.h>
but this one isn't available on architectures that don't have kprobes, so you can't include linux/kprobes.h in generic code without ifdef protection anymore. I'd say move the code to asm/kdebug.h if it's need by more than just kprobes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
