Hi all,
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:42:59 +0000 Leon Romanovsky <leo...@mellanox.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:52:54AM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 11:47:31AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > ERROR: "mlx5_get_send_wqe" [drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.ko]
> > > undefined!
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > > 34f4c9554d8b ("IB/mlx5: Use fragmented QP's buffer for in-kernel users")
> > >
> > > mlx5_get_send_wqe() is still used in drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cq.c
> > > and declared in drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h ...
> > >
> > > I have used the version of the rdma tree from next-20181203 for today.
> >
> > Huh. So apparently every compiler that tested this patch (0-day, mine,
> > the submitters) optimized this call away because is_atomic_response()
> > always returns 0: meaning mlx5_get_atomic_laddr is never callable and
> > can be deleted entirely, including the call to mlx5_get_send_wqe.
> >
> > Not sure what compiler setup will hit this, but it is clearly wrong
> > code..
> >
> > Guy/Leon, please send a fixup.. Maybe just delete all this
> > handle_atomics stuff?
>
> I deleted it and will wait for the results of regression prior to send the
> patch.I am still getting this error. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
pgpaqco9qxMqt.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
