On 13/11/2018 14:48, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> If a hwspinlock is defined in device tree use it to protect
> configuration registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaign...@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c 
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> index 0a2088e12d96..a010a2eed078 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> @@ -20,6 +21,8 @@
>  
>  #define IRQS_PER_BANK 32
>  
> +#define HWSPINLOCK_TIMEOUT   5 /* msec */
> +
>  struct stm32_exti_bank {
>       u32 imr_ofst;
>       u32 emr_ofst;
> @@ -47,6 +50,7 @@ struct stm32_exti_drv_data {
>  struct stm32_exti_chip_data {
>       struct stm32_exti_host_data *host_data;
>       const struct stm32_exti_bank *reg_bank;
> +     struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
>       struct raw_spinlock rlock;
>       u32 wake_active;
>       u32 mask_cache;
> @@ -275,25 +279,34 @@ static int stm32_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, 
> unsigned int type)
>       struct stm32_exti_chip_data *chip_data = gc->private;
>       const struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank = chip_data->reg_bank;
>       u32 rtsr, ftsr;
> -     int err;
> +     int err = 0;
>  
>       irq_gc_lock(gc);
>  
> +     if (chip_data->hwlock)
> +             err = hwspin_lock_timeout(chip_data->hwlock,
> +                                       HWSPINLOCK_TIMEOUT);
> +
> +     if (err)
> +             goto unlock;
> +
>       rtsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
>       ftsr = irq_reg_readl(gc, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
>  
>       err = stm32_exti_set_type(d, type, &rtsr, &ftsr);
> -     if (err) {
> -             irq_gc_unlock(gc);
> -             return err;
> -     }
> +     if (err)
> +             goto unspinlock;
>  
>       irq_reg_writel(gc, rtsr, stm32_bank->rtsr_ofst);
>       irq_reg_writel(gc, ftsr, stm32_bank->ftsr_ofst);
>  
> +unspinlock:
> +     if (chip_data->hwlock)
> +             hwspin_unlock(chip_data->hwlock);
> +unlock:
>       irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>  
> -     return 0;
> +     return err;
>  }
>  
>  static void stm32_chip_suspend(struct stm32_exti_chip_data *chip_data,
> @@ -670,6 +683,7 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(const struct 
> stm32_exti_drv_data *drv_data,
>       int nr_irqs, ret, i;
>       struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
>       struct irq_domain *domain;
> +     struct hwspinlock *hwlock = NULL;
>  
>       host_data = stm32_exti_host_init(drv_data, node);
>       if (!host_data)
> @@ -692,12 +706,22 @@ static int __init stm32_exti_init(const struct 
> stm32_exti_drv_data *drv_data,
>               goto out_free_domain;
>       }
>  
> +     /* hwspinlock is optional */
> +     ret = of_hwspin_lock_get_id(node, 0);
> +     if (ret < 0) {
> +             if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +                     goto out_free_domain;

Wouldn't it make sense to probe for this before allocating the domain?

> +     } else {
> +             hwlock = hwspin_lock_request_specific(ret);
> +     }
> +
>       for (i = 0; i < drv_data->bank_nr; i++) {
>               const struct stm32_exti_bank *stm32_bank;
>               struct stm32_exti_chip_data *chip_data;
>  
>               stm32_bank = drv_data->exti_banks[i];
>               chip_data = stm32_exti_chip_init(host_data, i, node);
> +             chip_data->hwlock = hwlock;
>  
>               gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(domain, i * IRQS_PER_BANK);
>  
> 

Thanks,

        M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Reply via email to