Hi, On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> because when i assumed the obvious, you called it an > insult so please dont leave any room for assumptions and remove any > ambiguity - especially as our communication seems to be marred by what > appears to be frequent misunderstandings ;-) What the hell is this supposed to be? How am I not to take this: "i did not want to embarrass you (and distract the discussion) with answering a pretty stupid, irrelevant question" as an insult? How does it reflect on someone if he asks "stupid, irrelevant questions"? If it had been a misunderstanding, you could have ask appropriately instead of assuming I'm an idiot. BTW Adding smileys to it doesn't make it any funnier, since it I don't believe in the "misunderstandings" theory anymore. :-( bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/