> Now we know when we can block so we can run f_ops->write ourselfs that's also > more efficient in terms of both performance and also memory pressure during > swap of course. Yep > As said reiserfs AFIK didn't need any change, so only VFS is using > fs_down/fs_up from the point of view of reiserfs. Ok. Im not keen on adding fs_down but it does look like the right bandage (and a nice speed up) for 2.2. I hate that kind of bug - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 thunder7
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 J Sloan
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.1... Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still... Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still... Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still... Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still... Chris Mason
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 J . A . Magallon
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 Mark Symonds
- Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 Mark Symonds