On 12/10/18 9:39 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 12/10/18 11:27 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 20:38:56 -0800 >> Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 11/12/18 8:08 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >>>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 18:36:30 -0800 >>>> Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We should have a checklist. That's a great idea. Now to find someone >>>>> to write it... :) >>>> >>>> Do we think the LPC session might have the right people to create such a >>>> thing? If so, I can try to put together a coherent presentation of the >>>> result. >>> >>> Hi, >>> Did anything ever happen with this syscall checklist suggestion? >> >> No, we really didn't have the right people around to do that, >> unfortunately. > > We already have Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst. > > The documentation there is quite thorough. > > It lists things that people commonly forget e.g. email > [email protected]. > > Would it be acceptable to attempt to collate per-libc information > into the adding-syscalls.rst under a new section called: > > "Integration with libc" >
I think that updates to adding-syscalls.rst would be sufficient, instead of having a new/separate syscalls-checklist file. thanks, -- ~Randy
