4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>

commit 86c1c87d0e6241cbe35bd52badfc84b154e1b959 upstream.

According to intel_read_wm_latency() it is perfectly legal for one WM
and all subsequent levels to be 0 (and the deeper powersaving states
disabled), so don't shout *ERROR*, over and over again.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
Link: 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180726161527.10516-1-ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2951,8 +2951,8 @@ static void intel_print_wm_latency(struc
                unsigned int latency = wm[level];
 
                if (latency == 0) {
-                       DRM_ERROR("%s WM%d latency not provided\n",
-                                 name, level);
+                       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s WM%d latency not provided\n",
+                                     name, level);
                        continue;
                }
 


Reply via email to