Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:

>
> Queued, thanks.  I moved this above the direct EOI series so that
> KVM_CAP_HYPERV_STIMER_DIRECT need not exist at any point of the history.
>

Thanks! Just to make sure (and to conclude our discussion with Roman):
with your Qemu maintainer hat on, do you agree with the design decision
that KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID's output value changes when
KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENLIGHTENED_VMCS gets enabled? This differs from
KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID (where we always list all feature bits even if
they require explicit enablement)?

-- 
Vitaly

Reply via email to