On 18.12.2018 00:09, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:41:46PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote: >> - '/\<DEFINE_\(MUTEX\|SEMAPHORE\|SPINLOCK\)(\([[:alnum:]_]*\)/\2/v/' >> + >> '/\<DEFINE_\(RT_MUTEX\|MUTEX\|SEMAPHORE\|SPINLOCK\)(\([[:alnum:]_]*\)/\2/v/' >> '/\<DEFINE_\(RAW_SPINLOCK\|RWLOCK\|SEQLOCK\)(\([[:alnum:]_]*\)/\2/v/' > > I don't know anything about regexes this complex or tags, but couldn't this > be '/\<DEFINE_\([[:upper:]_]\)(\([[:alnum:]_]*\)/\2/v/' to catch all > DEFINE_THINGIES?
I think, we can, but before this it's needed to change arguments order in macroses like DEFINE_PER_CPU(), and to check, whether tags won't be polluted something not needed (such wrong defines will be generated anyway, but if there will be not too many, than it's OK).
