On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:57 PM Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> wrote: > > > -static inline void plic_toggle(struct plic_handler *handler, > > - int hwirq, int enable) > > +static void plic_toggle(struct plic_handler *handler, int hwirq, int > > enable) > > { > > u32 __iomem *reg = handler->enable_base + (hwirq / 32) * sizeof(u32); > > u32 hwirq_mask = 1 << (hwirq % 32); > > @@ -92,27 +91,27 @@ static inline void plic_toggle(struct plic_handler > > *handler, > > raw_spin_unlock(&handler->enable_lock); > > } > > > > -static inline void plic_irq_toggle(struct irq_data *d, int enable) > > +static void plic_irq_toggle(const struct cpumask *mask, int hwirq, int > > enable) > > It also removes inline statements which seems rather unrelated to > the patch description.
Actually these functions should not be inline because plic_toggle() uses raw_spin_lock() and plic_irq_toggle() uses for-loop. > > Also the actual addintion of the single cpumask argument is simple > enough that it should probably go into the patch that makes use of it. OK, I will have separate patch for removing "inline" and move addition of cpumask argument to last patch. Regards, Anup