On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 07:08:15AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 06:18:15AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:57:24PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() gets another rewrite, this time to strip > > > it down to the bare minimum and explicitly break compliance with the > > > x86-64 ABI. Feedback from v4 revealed that __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() > > > would need to save (a lot) more than just the non-volatile GPRs to be > > > compliant with the x86-64 ABI, at which point breaking from the ABI > > > completely became much more palatable. > > > > > > The non-standard ABI also solves the question of "which GPRs should be > > > marshalled to/from the enclave" by getting out of the way entirely and > > > letting userspace have free reign (except for RSP, which has a big ol' > > > DO NOT TOUCH sign on it). > > > > Can you share a reference, or is this better documented in the > > accompanied patches? > > Patch 5/5 has more details, and v4 of the series has a lot of background > info by way of discussion: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Thanks Sean, I will. Have not had yet much time to look at this. /Jarkko
