On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:31:28PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
> 
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM8400
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig:    bool "Wolfson Microelectronics WM8400"
> 
> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
> 
> Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
> when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
> 
> Since module_init was not in use by this code, the init ordering
> remains unchanged with this commit.
> 
> A trivial function rename from wm8400_module_init to the name
> wm8400_driver_init is also done to reduce possible confusion.
> 
> Also note that MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is a no-op for non-modular code.
> 
> We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
> is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
> 
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> Cc: patc...@opensource.cirrus.com
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
> ---
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, wm8400_i2c_id);
>  
>  static struct i2c_driver wm8400_i2c_driver = {
>       .driver = {
> @@ -161,7 +160,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver wm8400_i2c_driver = {
>  };
>  #endif

Do we not want to add suppress_bind_attrs into the i2c_driver
struct here?

Thanks,
Charles

Reply via email to